Comparison of Efficacy and Safety between Thrombolysis Plus Anticoagulation vs. Anticoagulation Alone for the Treatment of Acute Submassive Pulmonary Embolism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Objective: The objective of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of thrombolysis plus anticoagulant therapy vs. anticoagulant therapy alone in acute submassive pulmonary embolism (PE).

Materials and methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for randomized clinical trials comparing thrombolytic therapy and anticoagulation vs. anticoagulation alone in acute submassive PE patients from 1 Jan 1980 to 20 Jan 2021, with no drug or dose restrictions. Data on upgraded treatment of clinical deterioration, all-cause mortality, PE recurrence and bleeding events were extracted and analyzed using Revman 5.3 software.

Results: A total of 10 randomized controlled trials involving 1871 patients were included in the study after screening. In terms of efficacy, thrombolysis combined with anticoagulant therapy reduced the need for upgrading treatment (3.6 vs. 10.9%, risk ratio (RR) 0.36, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24- 0.54, p<0.00001) and PE recurrence (0.8 vs. 2.9%, RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.69, p=0.003) in patients with acute submassive PE. Compared with anticoagulant therapy alone, the concomitant use of thrombolysis was associated with lower all-cause mortality (1.3 vs. 3.0%, RR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26-0.87, p=0.02), but it increased minor bleeding rate (31.4 vs. 8.4%, RR 3.71, 95% CI 2.82-4.88, p<0.0001) and major bleeding rate (8.8 vs. 2.6%, RR 3.35, 95%CI 2.03-5.54, p<0.0001).

Conclusion: The use of thrombolysis plus anticoagulant therapy in acute submassive PE was negatively associated with patients requiring escalation of treatment, PE recurrence, and all-cause mortality, but it was positively associated with bleeding.