Sensitivity-to-change and predictive validity of the Cervantes Short-Form (C-SF) questionnaire in postmenopausal women

Objectives: To explore, for the first time, the ability of the Cervantes Short-Form (C-SF) questionnaire to detect and to predict meaningful changes (sensitivity-to-change and predictive validity) in women with menopausal symptoms receiving any therapeutic management under routine medical care.

Methods: Postmenopausal women included in a registry study were the source of data. Sensitivity-to-change was explored by assessing the responses of C-SF to different type of treatment management: no treatment, natural therapies or systemic hormonal therapy (SHT). Predictive validity assessed the ability of baseline score to predict the reduction in the impact of menopausal symptoms in C-SF scoring equal or higher than one time its minimally important difference (MID) of improvement (response rate).

Results: A total of 245 women were enrolled. C-SF score was significantly reduced (better QoL) with SHT by 10.62 points versus no change or 2.32 point by natural therapies or no treatment, respectively (p < 0.001 in both cases). Women declaring better improvement after treatment showed higher significant reduction in C-SF score versus those with no self-perceived improvement or impairment: -12.49 point versus +1.06 and +12.71, respectively (p < 0,01 in both cases). Responder rate showed a significant lineal growing trend with higher C-SF scoring at baseline in women who received SHT: higher scoring showed higher response rates (lineal Chi² = 15.9, p < 0.001), but not in the case of receiving natural therapies or no treatment.

Conclusions: C-SF was shown to be sensitive-to-change when postmenopausal QOL status changes due to mainly systemic hormonal treatment, therefore, supporting the utilization of this instrument to monitor response to treatment. Likewise, pre-treatment scoring in C-SF was able to predict woman's QOL meaningful response with hormonal treatment.