Maintenance or consolidation therapy in small-cell lung cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Semin Oncol. 2022 Oct;49(5):389-393. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.09.001. Epub 2022 Sep 23.

Abstract

We performed an updated meta-analysis to explore the role of maintenance therapy in SCLC. Clinical trials with randomization to maintenance/consolidation (V) placebo or observation or best supportive care in SCLC, both extended and limited disease were searched from January 2009 to March 2022. The hazard ratios (HR) for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the relative 95% confidence interval (CI) were extracted from each study. Summary HR was calculated using random- or fixed-effects models, depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. A total of 9 studies were identified. Neither PFS nor OS were improved with maintenance/consolidation (PFS: random-effect; HR 0.93; 95% CI 0.71-1.21; P=0.10; OS: fixed-effect; HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.89-1.08; P=0.14). Among the different strategies, immunotherapy maintenance showed a significantly decreased risk of progression (V)standard of care (random-effect; HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.66-0.97; P=0.03). The current updated meta-analysis did not demonstrate a benefit of maintenance/consolidation therapy in SCLC, with only a PFS benefit for immunotherapy approach.

Keywords: SCLC; immune checkpoint inhibitors; maintenance therapy; predictive factors.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Consolidation Chemotherapy
  • Humans
  • Immunotherapy
  • Lung Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Progression-Free Survival