First-in-human study to evaluate safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of heterologous regimens using the multivalent filovirus vaccines Ad26.Filo and MVA-BN-Filo administered in different sequences and schedules: A randomized, controlled study

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 5;17(10):e0274906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274906. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

Background: Though clinically similar, Ebola virus disease and Marburg virus disease are caused by different viruses. Of the 30 documented outbreaks of these diseases in sub-Saharan Africa, eight were major outbreaks (≥200 cases; five caused by Zaire ebolavirus [EBOV], two by Sudan ebolavirus [SUDV], and one by Marburg virus [MARV]). Our purpose is to develop a multivalent vaccine regimen protecting against each of these filoviruses. This first-in-human study assessed the safety and immunogenicity of several multivalent two-dose vaccine regimens that contain Ad26.Filo and MVA-BN-Filo.

Methods: Ad26.Filo combines three vaccines encoding the glycoprotein (GP) of EBOV, SUDV, and MARV. MVA-BN-Filo is a multivalent vector encoding EBOV, SUDV, and MARV GPs, and Taï Forest nucleoprotein. This Phase 1, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolled healthy adults (18-50 years) into four groups, randomized 5:1 (active:placebo), to assess different Ad26.Filo and MVA-BN-Filo vaccine directionality and administration intervals. The primary endpoint was safety; immune responses against EBOV, SUDV, and MARV GPs were also assessed.

Results: Seventy-two participants were randomized, and 60 (83.3%) completed the study. All regimens were well tolerated with no deaths or vaccine-related serious adverse events (AEs). The most frequently reported solicited local AE was injection site pain/tenderness. Solicited systemic AEs most frequently reported were headache, fatigue, chills, and myalgia; most solicited AEs were Grade 1-2. Solicited/unsolicited AE profiles were similar between regimens. Twenty-one days post-dose 2, 100% of participants on active regimen responded to vaccination and exhibited binding antibodies against EBOV, SUDV, and MARV GPs; neutralizing antibody responses were robust against EBOV (85.7-100%), but lower against SUDV (35.7-100%) and MARV (0-57.1%) GPs. An Ad26.Filo booster induced a rapid further increase in humoral responses.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that heterologous two-dose vaccine regimens with Ad26.Filo and MVA-BN-Filo are well tolerated and immunogenic in healthy adults.

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02860650.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase I
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Animals
  • Antibodies, Neutralizing
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Ebola Vaccines*
  • Ebolavirus*
  • Glycoproteins
  • Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola*
  • Humans
  • Marburgvirus*
  • Middle Aged
  • Nucleoproteins
  • Vaccines, Combined
  • Vaccinia virus
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Antibodies, Neutralizing
  • Antibodies, Viral
  • Ebola Vaccines
  • Glycoproteins
  • Nucleoproteins
  • Vaccines, Combined

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT02860650