Bicondylar Tibial Plateau Fractures: What Predicts Infection?

J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct 15;30(20):e1311-e1318. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-21-00432. Epub 2022 Aug 16.

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to identify the patient, injury, and treatment factors associated with infection of bicondylar plateau fractures and to evaluate whether center variation exists.

Design: Retrospective review.

Setting: Eighteen academic trauma centers.

Patients/participants: A total of 1,287 patients with 1,297 OTA type 41-C bicondylar tibia plateau fractures who underwent open reduction and internal fixation were included. Exclusion criteria were follow-up less than 120 days, insufficient documentation, and definitive treatment only with external fixation.

Intervention: Open reduction and internal fixation.

Main outcome measurements: Superficial and deep infection.

Results: One hundred one patients (7.8%) developed an infection. In multivariate regression analysis, diabetes (DM) (OR [odds ratio] 3.24; P ≤ 0.001), alcohol abuse (EtOH) (OR 1.8; P = 0.040), dual plating (OR 1.8; P ≤ 0.001), and temporary external fixation (OR 2.07; P = 0.013) were associated with infection. In a risk-adjusted model, we found center variation in infection rates (P = 0.030).

Discussion: In a large series of patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of bicondylar plateau fractures, the infection rate was 7.8%. Infection was associated with DM, EtOH, combined dual plating, and temporary external fixation. Center expertise may also play a role because one center had a statistically lower rate and two trended toward higher rates after adjusting for confounders.

Level of evidence: Level IV-Therapeutic retrospective cohort study.

MeSH terms

  • Fracture Fixation
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal
  • Humans
  • Open Fracture Reduction
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Tibial Fractures* / etiology
  • Tibial Fractures* / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome