Is there a role for secondary debulking in ovarian cancer? A review of the current literature

Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Feb 1;35(1):1-5. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000831. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Until recently, no data was available from randomized, controlled trials (RCT) to assess the role of secondary cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in the management of recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. This review highlights results from the three completed RCTs, and other recent literature on this topic.

Recent findings: Both the AGO and iMODEL criteria predict high rates of complete gross resection at the time of secondary CRS. Overall survival (OS) was improved in the surgical arms in both DESKTOP 3 and SOC-1. In contrast, surgery did not improve OS in GOG 213, but greater than 80% of patients received bevacizumab with chemotherapy in GOG 213.

Summary: Secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer can be considered in patients who meet specific criteria. Available data supports improvement in OS for patients not receiving bevacizumab, who achieve complete gross resection. Surgery is harmful to patients with gross residual disease.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Bevacizumab / therapeutic use
  • Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial / drug therapy
  • Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial / surgery
  • Chronic Disease
  • Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures* / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / drug therapy
  • Ovarian Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Ovarian Neoplasms* / surgery

Substances

  • Bevacizumab