Impact of different endometrial preparation protocols before frozen embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes: a review

Fertil Steril. 2022 Nov;118(5):820-827. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.09.003.

Abstract

The use of frozen embryo transfer cycles has exponentially increased in the last few years. Optimization of endometrial preparation protocols before frozen embryo transfer is mandatory to further improve pregnancy outcomes. This review will focus on the existing literature with regard to the different available endometrial preparation protocols and their impact on pregnancy outcomes. More specifically, we will focus on programmed, natural, and stimulated frozen embryo transfer cycles. The studies performed on this topic are generally of low quality, and only a few well-performed randomized controlled trials have been published. To date, no strong evidence is available to support the use of 1 preparation method over another in terms of pregnancy outcomes. However, robust data have shown a clearly protective effect of natural frozen embryo transfer cycles against long-term obstetric complications, mainly hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and large for gestational age infants. The introduction of individualized luteal phase support in different endometrial preparation protocols is actually gaining a lot of attention and requires further investigation.

Keywords: Frozen embryo transfer; natural cycle; programmed cycle; stimulated cycle.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cryopreservation* / methods
  • Embryo Transfer* / methods
  • Endometrium
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Luteal Phase
  • Pregnancy
  • Pregnancy Rate
  • Retrospective Studies