Reply to Peng et al.: Chicken tessellation requires more pieces

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Nov;119(44):e2213678119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2213678119. Epub 2022 Oct 24.

Joris Peters^{1

2

3}, Dorian Q Fuller^{4

5}, Evan K Irving-Pease^{6

7}, Ophélie Lebrasseur^{7

8

9}, Julia Best^{10

11}, Riley Smallman¹², Greger Larson⁷

¹ ArchaeoBioCenter, Ludwig Maxmilian University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany.
² Institute of Palaeoanatomy, Domestication Research and the History of Veterinary Medicine, Ludwig Maxmilian University Munich, 80539 Munich, Germany.
³ Bavarian Natural History Collections, State Collection of Palaeoanatomy Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany.
⁴ Institute of Archaeology, University College London, London WC1H 0PY, United Kingdom.
⁵ School of Cultural Heritage, Northwest University, 710069 Xi'an, China.
⁶ Lundbeck Foundation GeoGenetics Centre, GLOBE Institute, University of Copenhagen, 1165 Copenhagen, Denmark.
⁷ Palaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, United Kingdom.
⁸ Centre for Anthropobiology and Genomics of Toulouse, Université de Toulouse Paul Sabatier, CNRS, Toulouse, 31000 France.
⁹ Instituto Nacional de Antropología y Pensamiento Latinoamericano, Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, C1426BJN, Argentina.
¹⁰ Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, Bournemouth University, Poole BH12 5BB, United Kingdom.
¹¹ School of History, Archaeology and Religion, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, United Kingdom.
¹² Department of Archaeology, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4PY, United Kingdom.

No abstract available

Publication types