Prior research on disconnected youth has defined connectedness to school or work during emerging adulthood as an either/or outcome, conflicting with research on emerging adulthood, which suggests varied, individualized pathways. This study used a growth mixture model method with data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics Transition into Adulthood Supplement to elucidate developmental heterogeneity in connectedness to school or work during emerging adulthood (n = 1,977). Results indicated distinct subgroups of connectedness to school or work with additional variation within groups. Racialized group and parenting status differentiated between being fully connected or not but did not explain differences among those with less consistent connectedness. Policy implications include that the timing and duration of policies targeting disconnected youth may be missing a substantial minority of young people. Re-thinking supports for disconnected youth can be further informed by future research focused on examining factors related to individual differences in the timing and nature of connectedness to school or work.
Keywords: Connectedness; Disconnected youth; Growth mixture model; Opportunity youth; Transition into adulthood.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.