Optimizing menstrual health and hygiene management in the U.S.: A mixed-methods study of the barriers and the role of healthcare professionals

Objective: Menstrual health (MH) practices have been understudied in the U.S. This study aimed to assess patient and medical staff views of MH.

Methods: The mixed-methods approach included medical staff and patient surveys, and patient interviews on MH experiences. Quantitative survey data generated descriptive statistics. Thematic content analysis (TCA) evaluated qualitative interviews. Convergent Parallel Triangulation Analysis (CPTA) evaluated both datasets in tandem.

Results: The medical staff survey's response rate was 72% (54 participants/75 invited staff). Only 7% (4/54) of staff consistently asked patients about menstrual products (MP), while 54% (29/54) were concerned about patients affording MP. The patient survey's response rate was 90% (186/207); 22% (40/186) of respondents showed MH insecurity, which was associated with annual income <$30,000 (p < 0.01); 45% (85/186) missed commitments during menses; 53% (98/186) never discussed MP with healthcare providers. To reach thematic saturation 10/17 invited patients were interviewed. Five themes were identified through TCA: menstruation as a social barrier; menstrual education comes from a variety of sources; MP choice is a balance of comfort, cost, and convenience; patients value relationships with their providers; adolescence is the window for establishing MH. Three threads were identified through CPTA: MH insecurity is common; MH screening and education are limited; menstruation impacts patients' ability to engage in daily activities.

Conclusion: A holistic approach toward MH is needed; education and screening are inconsistent. Comprehensive MH can enhance a patient's understanding of and capacity to advocate for their health. These findings are specific to this population and may not be generalizable.