Objectives: As current studies on the relationships between air pollutants exposure during the first trimester and birth defects were not fully elucidated, this study aimed to assess the association between selected air pollutants and birth defects.
Design: An observational study.
Participants: We obtained 70 854 singletons with gestational age <20 weeks who were delivered at a large maternal and child healthcare centre in Wuhan, China.
Outcome measures: Birth defects data and daily average concentration of ambient particulate matter ≤10 µm diameter (PM10), PM ≤2.5 µm diameter (PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) were obtained. Logistic regression analysis was applied to assess the association between maternal air pollutants exposure during first trimester and total birth defects, congenital heart defects (CHDs), limb defects and orofacial clefts with adjustments of potential covariates.
Results: There were a total of 1352 birth defect cases included in this study, with a prevalence of 19.08‰. Maternal exposed to high concentrations of PM10, PM2.5, NO2 and SO2 in the first trimester were significantly associated with elevated ORs of birth defects (ORs ranged from 1.13 to 1.23). Additionally, for male fetuses, maternal exposed to high PM2.5 concentration was associated with an elevated odd of CHDs (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.52). In the cold season, the ORs of birth defects were significantly increased among women exposed to PM2.5 (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.41 to 1.91), NO2 (OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.38) and SO2 (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.47).
Conclusions: This study showed unfavourable effects of air pollutants exposure during the first trimester on birth defects. Especially, the association between maternal PM2.5 exposure and CHDs was only observed among male fetuses, and stronger effects of PM2.5, NO2 and SO2 exposure on birth defects were observed in the cold season.
Keywords: EPIDEMIOLOGY; Fetal medicine; Prenatal diagnosis.
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.