ACACIAS 1: The physiological and subjective impacts of high fidelity simulation of the breaking of bad news

J Visc Surg. 2023 Oct;160(5):323-329. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Mar 31.

Abstract

Study objective: Breaking bad news (BN) is difficult and necessitates targeted training. To be effective, training may call for High Fidelity Simulation (HFS). This prospective study was conducted to objectively assess the impact of HFS as a tool conducive to the development of clinical competence in situations involving the delivery of bad news.

Methods: This feasibility study was conducted from January to May 2021 and included students in medical oncology and digestive surgery. The subjective and objective impacts of HFS were evaluated by means of a self-administered questionnaire and a wristband, Affect-tag, which recorded several indicators: emotional power (EP), emotional density (DE) and cognitive load (CL) in students undergoing training.

Results: Forty-six (46) students with a median age of 25 years (21-34 years) were included. While the participants were effectively and emotionally involved in the HFS training, they were not completely overwhelmed by their emotions, a possible occurrence in this type of program. After two training programs, the students presented with lower EP (P<0.001) and higher DE (P=0.005), while their CL remained stable (P=0.751). The information given in the self-administered questionnaires and the evaluations by outside professionals (actor, nurse, psychologist…) highlighted improved skills.

Conclusion: Taking into account the emotional parameters observed and the questionnaires collected, HFS can be considered as a suitable and effective tool in the breaking of bad news.

Keywords: Breaking bad news; Cancer; Education; Simulation; Training.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acacia*
  • Adult
  • Clinical Competence
  • High Fidelity Simulation Training*
  • Humans
  • Prospective Studies
  • Truth Disclosure