Objective: To measure and analyze the shoulder circumferences of adults' permanent teeth crown preparations based on data collected through the intraoral scanning, so as to provide dental anatomy data for clinical diagnosis and analysis. Methods: Intraoral scanning data of 840 complete crown preparations were collected, and were entrusted to the World Dental Laboratory Co., Ltd. in Fuzhou between March 2021 and June 2022. Except the data of the third molar, the rest data were categorized in terms of 14 tooth positions in the upper and lower jaw (each category involved 30 samples from male group and 30 samples from female group). Image measurement software was used to measure the shoulder circumferences of permanent teeth crown preparations. And analysis was conducted to reveal the difference of shoulder circumference diameters between male and female groups. And then they were grouped according to the mean value at each tooth position, on the premise that the difference between the maximum and minimum values and the mean value of the entire group was≤±1.00 mm. Analysis were further conducted to determine the differences of shoulder circumference diameters between each dental position and the differences between male and female in the same groups. Results: Bivariate analysis of variance showed that gender had no effect on the shoulder circumference of full crown preparations (F=0.55, P=1.457), while tooth position had a significant impact on the shoulder circumference of full crown preparations (F=273.15, P<0.001). The samples were classified into 5 groups according to the mean values of shoulder circumference diameters relating to each tooth position. Statistical analysis showed that Group 1, covering maxillary lateral incisor, mandibular central incisor and mandibular lateral incisor, had shoulder circumference with diameters of (16.62±2.21) mm; Group 2, consisting of maxillary central incisor, maxillary cusp, mandibular cusp, mandibular first premolar and mandibular second premolar, had diameters of (20.78±2.48) mm; Group 3, consisting of maxillary first premolar and maxillary second premolar, had diamerters of (22.09±2.72) mm; Group 4, covering maxillary first molar, maxillary second molar and mandibular first molar, had diamerters of (30.21±2.67) mm; while group 5, with mandibular second molar alone its member, had diamerters of (31.34±3.18) mm. The difference among the 5 groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions: Significant differences of shoulder circumference diameters could be found between different tooth positions, while at the same tooth position, the differences between male and female are not significant. The 14 tooth positions could be grouped into 5 groups according to their shoulder circumference diameters. Future research could take the grouping as reference.
目的： 基于口内扫描数据测量和分析成人恒牙全冠预备体肩台周径，为口腔临床提供牙体解剖学数据。 方法： 选择2021年3月至2022年6月间送至福州市维尔德义齿加工厂进行义齿制作的840颗全冠预备体口内扫描数据，除第三磨牙外，分为上下颌14个牙位（同颌同名牙归入相同牙位，每个牙位全冠预备体男女各30颗），使用图像测量软件测量全冠预备体肩台周径。分析各牙位肩台周径的性别差异，并根据各牙位数据均值进行分组，使每组最大和最小值与整组均值的差值≤±1.00 mm。分析各组肩台周径的差异及同组肩台周径的性别差异。 结果： 双因素方差分析显示，性别对全冠预备体肩台周径无影响（F=0.55，P=1.457），牙位对全冠预备体肩台周径有显著影响（F=273.15，P<0.001）。根据各牙位全冠预备体肩台周径均值分为5组，1组包括上颌侧切牙、下颌中切牙、下颌侧切牙，肩台周径为（16.62±2.21）mm；2组包括上颌中切牙、上颌尖牙、下颌尖牙、下颌第一前磨牙、下颌第二前磨牙，肩台周径为（20.78±2.48）mm；3组包括上颌第一前磨牙、上颌第二前磨牙，肩台周径为（22.09±2.72）mm；4组包括上颌第一磨牙、上颌第二磨牙、下颌第一磨牙，肩台周径为（30.21±2.67）mm，5组仅有下颌第二磨牙，肩台周径为（31.34±3.18）mm；5组肩台周径两两比较差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论： 各牙位全冠预备体肩台周径各不相同，相同牙位全冠预备体肩台周径无性别差异，14个牙位可根据肩台周径长度大致分为5组，可为后续研究提供分组依据。.