Diagnostic performance and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of gallbladder lesions: A systematic review with meta-analysis

Indian J Gastroenterol. 2023 Aug;42(4):467-474. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01374-4. Epub 2023 Jun 6.

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (TA) is widely used for various target samples, but its efficacy in gallbladder (GB) lesions is unknown. The aim of the present meta-analysis was to assess the pooled adequacy, accuracy and safety of EUS-TA of GB lesions.

Methods: A literature search from January 2000 to August 2022 was done for studies analyzing the outcome of EUS-guided TA in patients with GB lesions. Pooled event rates were expressed with summative statistics.

Results: The pooled rate of sample adequacy for all GB lesions and malignant GB lesions was 97.0% (95% CI: 94.5-99.4) and 96.6% (95% CI: 93.8-99.3), respectively. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of malignant lesions were 90% (95% CI: 85-94; I2 = 0.0%) and 100% (95% CI: 86-100; I2 = 0.0%), respectively, with an area under the curve of 0.915. EUS-guided TA had a pooled diagnostic accuracy rate of 94.6% (95% CI: 90.5-96.6) for all GB lesions and 94.1% (95% CI: 91.0-97.2) for malignant GB lesions. There were six reported mild adverse events (acute cholecystitis = 1, self-limited bleeding = 2, self-limited episode of pain = 3) with a pooled incidence of 1.8% (95% CI: 0.0-3.8) and none of the patients had serious adverse events.

Conclusion: EUS-guided tissue acquisition from GB lesions is a safe technique with high sample adequacy and diagnostic accuracy. EUS-TA can be an alternative when traditional sampling techniques fail or are not feasible.

Keywords: Endoscopic ultrasound; Fine-needle aspiration; Fine-needle biopsy; Gallbladder masses; Meta-analysis.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration* / methods
  • Endosonography / adverse effects
  • Gallbladder* / diagnostic imaging
  • Humans
  • Sensitivity and Specificity