Patients' perceptions of the post-pancreatectomy discharge process

HPB (Oxford). 2023 Oct;25(10):1179-1186. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 Apr 14.

Abstract

Background: Complications after pancreatectomies contribute to poor outcomes. Patients are expected to identify signs/symptoms leading to these complications but may be poorly educated on how to identify them. We assessed the impact of an educational tool on patient perceptions of, and satisfaction with the discharge process, and its effect on readmission rates.

Methods: A prospective cohort study with retrospective chart review including patients who underwent pancreatic resection was undertaken. An interactive educational module (iBook) that provided information about the procedure, possible complications, and peri-discharge information was implemented. English-speaking patients were equally divided into the pre- and post-iBook cohorts. Primary outcome was patients' satisfaction with discharge; Secondary outcomes were 30- and 90-day readmission rates.

Results: 100 patients were included. Mean age was 65.5 ± 12.6, 46% were female, and 92.3% were white. Most patients underwent Whipple procedures (72%), and distal pancreatectomies (26%). In the post-implementation group, 92% were satisfied with the discharge process, and 89% reported it was a good tool. There were no statistical differences in 30- and 90-day readmission rates between cohorts.

Conclusion: The iBook positively impacted patients' satisfaction and preparedness for discharge. Readmission rates were not statistically significantly impacted but could be investigated with further studies of greater sample sizes.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pancreatectomy* / adverse effects
  • Pancreatectomy* / methods
  • Pancreaticoduodenectomy / adverse effects
  • Patient Discharge*
  • Patient Readmission
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Postoperative Complications / therapy
  • Prospective Studies
  • Retrospective Studies