New Robotic Platforms in General Surgery: What's the Current Clinical Scenario?

Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jul 7;59(7):1264. doi: 10.3390/medicina59071264.

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Robotic surgery has been widely adopted in general surgery worldwide but access to this technology is still limited to a few hospitals. With the recent introduction of new robotic platforms, several studies reported the feasibility of different surgical procedures. The aim of this systematic review is to highlight the current clinical practice with the new robotic platforms in general surgery. Materials and Methods: A grey literature search was performed on the Internet to identify the available robotic systems. A PRISMA compliant systematic review was conducted for all English articles up to 10 February 2023 searching the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Clinical outcomes, training process, operating surgeon background, cost-analysis, and specific registries were evaluated. Results: A total of 103 studies were included for qualitative synthesis after the full-text screening. Of the fifteen robotic platforms identified, only seven were adopted in a clinical environment. Out of 4053 patients, 2819 were operated on with a new robotic device. Hepatopancreatobiliary surgery specialty performed the majority of procedures, and the most performed procedure was cholecystectomy. Globally, 109 emergency surgeries were reported. Concerning the training process, only 45 papers reported the background of the operating surgeon, and only 28 papers described the training process on the surgical platform. Only one cost-analysis compared a new robot to the existing reference. Two manufacturers promoted a specific registry to collect clinical outcomes. Conclusions: This systematic review highlights the feasibility of most surgical procedures in general surgery using the new robotic platforms. Adoption of these new devices in general surgery is constantly growing with the extension of regulatory approvals. Standardization of the training process and the assessment of skills' transferability is still lacking. Further studies are required to better understand the real clinical and economical benefit.

Keywords: abdominal wall surgery; breast surgery; colorectal surgery; endocrine surgery; environmental sustainability; hepatobiliary surgery; new surgical robots; robotic surgery; training; upper gastrointestinal surgery.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cholecystectomy
  • Hospitals
  • Humans
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures* / methods
  • Robotics* / methods
  • Surgeons*

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.