Implicit Assessment of Non-Suicidal Self-Injury: Group Differences in Temporal Stability of the Self-Injury Implicit Association Test (SI-IAT)

Arch Suicide Res. 2024 Jul-Sep;28(3):892-904. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2023.2247042. Epub 2023 Aug 17.

Abstract

Objective: We examine differences on the Self-Injury Implicit Association Test (SI-IAT) by history of non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI), in a test-retest design, to examine short-term temporal stability of SI-IAT scores.

Method: Treatment-seeking participants (N = 113; 58% female; 89% White; Mage = 30.57) completed the SI-IAT and self-report measures at two time points (MTimeframe = 3.8 days).

Results: Data suggested NSSI (51% of the sample endorsed lifetime NSSI) was related to Time 1 (T1) identity and attitude, and affected stability of scores. T1 and T2 SI-IAT identity and attitude were more strongly related for participants with NSSI history. NSSI characteristics (recency; number of methods) affected stability.

Conclusions: The short-term test-retest reliability of the SI-IAT is strong among those with NSSI history from T1 to T2. However, the SI-IATs use with participants without a history of NSSI was not supported beyond its established ability to differentiate between groups by NSSI history. This test may provide clinically-relevant assessment among those with a history of NSSI.

Keywords: Implicit attitudes; SI-IAT; implicit identity; non-suicidal self-injury; test-retest.

Plain language summary

Participants with vs. without NSSI history respond differently on the SI-IATTemporal stability of SI-IAT performance is strong in a short timeframeResults supported the test-retest reliability of the SI-IAT in the target group.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Self Report
  • Self-Injurious Behavior* / psychology
  • Young Adult