Assessing the size and growth of the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation industry

PLoS One. 2023 Sep 27;18(9):e0285139. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285139. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Interest has focused on quantifying the size and scope of environmental markets, particularly those that offset ecosystem impacts or restore natural infrastructure to improve habitat or promote clean air and water. In this paper, we focus on the US wetland and stream compensatory mitigation market, asking: what types of firms make up the mitigation "industry"? What are the economic impacts-i.e., the "size"-of the mitigation industry? How has this industry changed over time? We present the results of a national survey of mitigation firms and construct an input-output model of the industry's economic impacts and employment. We also develop a comparative, 2014 model of the industry using data from a previous study of the broader, ecological restoration economy. Our findings suggest that the (2019, pre-COVID) mitigation industry collects annual revenues (direct economic impacts) in excess of $3.5 billion, which, along with additional indirect (supply chain) and induced (spillover) economic impacts, combine to over $9.6 billion in total output and support over 53,000 total jobs. We estimate 2014-2019 growth of ~35.2 percent in revenues, ~32.6 percent in total economic impacts, and a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 5.25%. This places the mitigation industry within the range of other, well-established industries within the technical services sector. We suggest establishing North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes specifically for ecological restoration and mitigation firms, an essential step in generating accurate and consistent employment estimates in the future, particularly at sub-national geographic scales.

Grants and funding

Funding for this study was provided to T.K. by the Ecological Restoration Business Association (ERBA). The funder had no role in study design, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the final manuscript. The funder – an industry association of ecological restoration firms – provided contact information for their members and the executive director and executive boards (2021 and 2022) provided survey pre-testing input and background information.