Comparing the Effect of Pre-Biopsy Rectal Cleaning Together with Biopsy Needle Disinfection to Each Technique Alone on Hospitalization Rates because of Post-Biopsy Infections

Urol Int. 2024;108(1):60-64. doi: 10.1159/000535033. Epub 2023 Nov 8.

Abstract

Introduction: To compare the effects of three techniques: biopsy needle disinfection with 10% formalin solution, povidone-iodine rectal cleaning, and the use of both methods to decrease hospitalization due to infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy.

Methods: A total of 827 patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 patient data were analyzed retrospectively, while patients of groups 2 and 3 were followed up prospectively. Group 1 included 361 patients who underwent biopsy needle disinfection with a 10% formalin solution. Group 2 included 235 patients who underwent biopsy needle disinfection and povidone-iodine rectal cleaning. Group 3 included 231 patients who underwent povidone-iodine rectal cleaning only. The outcome scale was the number of patients hospitalized for biopsy-related infection 30 days after the date of transrectal prostate biopsy.

Results: The hospitalization rates due to biopsy-related infectious complications were 3.0%, 0%, and 1.7% in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The only statistically significant difference was found between groups 1 and 2.

Conclusion: Biopsy needle disinfection and rectal cleaning with povidone-iodine seem to have greater potential to reduce infectious complications when applied together. Further prospective studies are required to confirm these findings.

Keywords: Formalin disinfection; Infectious complications; Povidone-iodine; Prostate biopsy.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Bacterial Infections* / etiology
  • Biopsy / adverse effects
  • Disinfection
  • Formaldehyde
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Povidone-Iodine*
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • Formaldehyde
  • Povidone-Iodine