Predicting Visual Acuity Responses to Anti-VEGF Treatment in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials Using Machine Learning

Ophthalmol Retina. 2024 May;8(5):419-430. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2023.11.010. Epub 2023 Nov 24.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate multiple machine learning (ML) models for predicting 2-year visual acuity (VA) responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) treatment in the Comparison of Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) Treatments Trials (CATT) for patients with neovascular AMD (nAMD).

Design: Secondary analysis of public data from a randomized clinical trial.

Participants: A total of 1029 CATT participants who completed 2 years of follow-up with untreated active nAMD and baseline VA between 20/25 and 20/320 in the study eye.

Methods: Five ML models (support vector machine, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, multilayer perceptron neural network, and lasso) were applied to clinical and image data from baseline and weeks 4, 8, and 12 for predicting 4 VA outcomes (≥ 15-letter VA gain, ≥ 15-letter VA loss, VA change from baseline, and actual VA) at 2 years. The CATT data from 1029 participants were randomly split for training (n = 717), from which the models were trained using 10-fold cross-validation, and for final validation on a test data set (n = 312).

Main outcome measures: Performances of ML models were assessed by R2 and mean absolute error (MAE) for predicting VA change from baseline and actual VA at 2 years, by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for predicting ≥ 15-letter VA gain and loss from baseline.

Results: Using training data up to week 12, the ML models from cross-validation achieved mean R2 of 0.24 to 0.29 (MAE = 9.1-9.8 letters) for predicting VA change and 0.37 to 0.41 (MAE = 9.3-10.2 letters) for predicting actual VA at 2 years. The mean AUCs for predicting ≥ 15-letter VA gain and loss at 2 years was 0.84 to 0.85 and 0.58 to 0.73, respectively. In final validation on the test data set up to week 12, the models had an R2 of 0.33 to 0.38 (MAE = 8.9-9.9 letters) for predicting VA change, an R2 of 0.37 to 0.45 (MAE = 8.8-10.2 letters) for predicting actual VA at 2 years, and AUCs of 0.85 to 0.87 and 0.67 to 0.79 for predicting ≥ 15-letter VA gain and loss, respectively.

Conclusions: Machine learning models have the potential to predict 2-year VA response to anti-VEGF treatment using clinical and imaging features from the loading dose phase, which can aid in decision-making around treatment protocols for patients with nAMD.

Financial disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Keywords: Age-related macular degeneration; Anti-VEGF therapy; Machine learning; Prediction; Visual acuity.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Multicenter Study
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors* / administration & dosage
  • Bevacizumab / administration & dosage
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Intravitreal Injections*
  • Machine Learning*
  • Male
  • ROC Curve
  • Ranibizumab* / administration & dosage
  • Tomography, Optical Coherence / methods
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A* / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Visual Acuity*
  • Wet Macular Degeneration* / diagnosis
  • Wet Macular Degeneration* / drug therapy
  • Wet Macular Degeneration* / physiopathology

Substances

  • Angiogenesis Inhibitors
  • Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A
  • Ranibizumab
  • Bevacizumab