11 C-Acetate PET/CT for Reactive Astrogliosis Outperforms 11 C-Methionine PET/CT in Glioma Classification and Survival Prediction

Clin Nucl Med. 2024 Feb 1;49(2):109-115. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0000000000004991. Epub 2023 Dec 4.

Abstract

Purpose: 11 C-acetate (ACE) PET/CT visualizes reactive astrogliosis in tumor microenvironment. This study compared 11 C-ACE and 11 C-methionine (MET) PET/CT for glioma classification and predicting patient survival.

Patients and methods: In this prospective study, a total of 142 patients with cerebral gliomas underwent preoperative MRI, 11 C-MET PET/CT, and 11 C-ACE PET/CT. Tumor-to-contralateral cortex (TNR MET ) and tumor-to-choroid plexus ratios (TNR ACE ) were calculated for 11 C-MET and 11 C-ACE. The Kruskal-Wallis test and Bonferroni post hoc analysis were used to compare the differences in 11 C-TNR MET and 11 C-TNR ACE . The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and classification and regression tree models were used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results: The median 11 C-TNR MET and 11 C-TNR ACE for oligodendrogliomas (ODs), IDH1 -mutant astrocytomas, IDH1 -wildtype astrocytomas, and glioblastomas were 2.75, 1.40, 2.30, and 3.70, respectively, and 1.40, 1.20, 1.77, and 2.87, respectively. The median 11 C-TNR MET was significantly different among the groups, except between ODs and IDH1 -wildtype astrocytomas, whereas the median 11 C-TNR ACE was significantly different among all groups. The classification and regression tree model identified 4 risk groups ( IDH1 -mutant with 11 C-TNR ACE ≤ 1.4, IDH1 -mutant with 11 C-TNR ACE > 1.4, IDH1 -wildtype with 11 C-TNR ACE ≤ 1.8, and IDH1 -wildtype with 11 C-TNR ACE > 1.8), with median PFS of 52.7, 44.5, 25.9, and 8.9 months, respectively. Using a 11 C-TNR ACE cutoff of 1.4 for IDH1 -mutant gliomas and a 11 C-TNR ACE cutoff of 2.0 for IDH1 -wildtype gliomas, all gliomas were divided into 4 groups with median OS of 52.7, 46.8, 27.6, and 12.0 months, respectively. Significant differences in PFS and OS were observed among the 4 groups after correcting for multiple comparisons.

Conclusions: 11 C-ACE PET/CT is better for glioma classification and survival prediction than 11 C-MET PET/CT, highlighting its potential role in cerebral glioma patients.

MeSH terms

  • Acetates
  • Astrocytoma*
  • Brain Neoplasms* / diagnostic imaging
  • Brain Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Glioma* / diagnostic imaging
  • Glioma* / pathology
  • Gliosis
  • Humans
  • Inflammation
  • Methionine
  • Mutation
  • Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography
  • Prognosis
  • Prospective Studies
  • Racemethionine
  • Tumor Microenvironment

Substances

  • Methionine
  • Racemethionine
  • Acetates