The primary purpose of this experiment was to examine the cardiac effects of instructions and biofeedback to reduce heart rate during both rest and a behavioral stressor. A second purpose was to assess respiratory, hemodynamic, and metabolic function in conjunction with heart rate. A final aim was to compare the effects of biofeedback on Type A and B men. Type A subjects fell in the upper 10% of the distribution of Jenkin's Activity Survey scores and Type B subjects fell in the lower 10%. Subjects experienced one of three instructional sets during an initial session: instructions to reduce heart rate with biofeedback; instructions to reduce heart rate without biofeedback; and instructions to sit quietly. During a second session, all subjects received identical instructions prior to the behavioral stressor. Heart rate, pulmonary gas exchange, and ventilation were measured breath-by-breath. During the first session, the groups did not differ in any measured parameter, but Type As had higher heart rates than did Type Bs across all conditions. During the second session, subjects given instructions to reduce heart rate with and without biofeedback did not differ in heart rate; as expected, however, both of these groups had smaller increases in heart rate than did the control group. Interestingly, the tachycardia of the control group occurred without an increase in oxygen consumption, indicating a cardiac-metabolic dissociation in this group. The modification of heart rate without a concomitant change in metabolism is important in understanding the association between cardiac and metabolic function.