Cardiac resynchronization therapy for pacing induced cardiomyopathy: Role of baseline right ventricular pacing burden

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2024 Feb;47(2):336-341. doi: 10.1111/pace.14929. Epub 2024 Jan 25.

Abstract

Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is indicated for patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing burden ≥40% (pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, PICM). It is uncertain whether baseline RV pacing burden impacts response to CRT.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all CRT upgrades for PICM at our hospital from January 2017 to December 2018. Univariate and multivariable-adjusted changes in LVEF, and echocardiographic response (≥10% improvement in LVEF) at 3-12 months post-CRT upgrade were compared in those with RV pacing burden ≥90% versus <90%.

Results: We included 75 patients (age 74 ± 11 years, 71% male) who underwent CRT upgrade for PICM. The baseline RV pacing burden was ≥90% in 56 patients (median 99% [IQR 98%-99%]), and <90% in 19 patients (median 79% [IQR 73%-87%]). Improvement in LVEF was greater in those with baseline RV pacing burden ≥90% versus <90% (15.7 ± 9.3% vs. 7.5 ± 9.6%, p = .003). Baseline RV pacing burden ≥90% was a strong predictor of an improvement in LVEF ≥10% after CRT upgrade both in univariate and multivariate-adjusted models (p = .005 and .02, respectively).

Conclusion: A higher baseline RV pacing burden predicts a greater improvement in LVEF after CRT upgrade for PICM.

Keywords: CRT response; cardiac resynchronization therapy; chronic right ventricle pacing; heart failure; pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
  • Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy*
  • Cardiomyopathies* / therapy
  • Female
  • Heart Failure* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stroke Volume / physiology
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Ventricular Function, Left