Percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation for adolescents with irritable bowel syndrome: Cost-benefit and cost-minimization analysis

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2024 Mar;78(3):608-613. doi: 10.1002/jpn3.12118. Epub 2024 Jan 15.

Abstract

Abdominal pain drives significant cost for adolescents with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). We performed an economic analysis to estimate cost-savings for patients' families and healthcare insurance, and health outcomes, based on abdominal pain improvement with percutaneous electrical nerve field stimulation (PENFS) with IB-Stim® (Neuraxis). We constructed a Markov model with a 1-year time horizon comparing outcomes and costs with PENFS versus usual care without PENFS. Clinical outcomes were derived from a sham-controlled double-blind trial of PENFS for adolescents with IBS. Costs/work-productivity impact for parents were derived from appropriate observational cohorts. PENFS was associated with 18 added healthy days over 1 year of follow-up, increased annual parental wages of $5,802 due to fewer missed work days to care for the child, and $4744 in cost-savings to insurance. Percutaneous electrical field nerve stimulation for adolescents with IBS appears to yield significant cost-savings to patients' families and insurance.

Keywords: comparative effectiveness research; costs and cost analysis; diagnostic testing; insurance; medical devices.

MeSH terms

  • Abdominal Pain / complications
  • Abdominal Pain / therapy
  • Adolescent
  • Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Delivery of Health Care
  • Humans
  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome* / complications
  • Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation*