Self-report assessment of Positive Appraisal Style (PAS): Development of a process-focused and a content-focused questionnaire for use in mental health and resilience research

PLoS One. 2024 Feb 2;19(2):e0295562. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295562. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Positive Appraisal Style Theory of Resilience posits that a person's general style of evaluating stressors plays a central role in mental health and resilience. Specifically, a tendency to appraise stressors positively (positive appraisal style; PAS) is theorized to be protective of mental health and thus a key resilience factor. To this date no measures of PAS exist. Here, we present two scales that measure perceived positive appraisal style, one focusing on cognitive processes that lead to positive appraisals in stressful situations (PASS-process), and the other focusing on the appraisal contents (PASS-content). For PASS-process, the items of the existing questionnaires Brief COPE and CERQ-short were analyzed in exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) in independent samples (N = 1157 and N = 1704). The resulting 10-item questionnaire was internally consistent (α = .78, 95% CI [.86, .87]) and showed good convergent and discriminant validity in comparisons with self-report measures of trait optimism, neuroticism, urgency, and spontaneity. For PASS-content, a newly generated item pool of 29 items across stressor appraisal content dimensions (probability, magnitude, and coping potential) were subjected to EFA and CFA in two independent samples (N = 1174 and N = 1611). The resulting 14-item scale showed good internal consistency (α = .87, 95% CI [.86, .87]), as well as good convergent and discriminant validity within the nomological network. The two scales are a new and reliable way to assess self-perceived positive appraisal style in large-scale studies, which could offer key insights into mechanisms of resilience.

MeSH terms

  • Factor Analysis, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Mental Health
  • Psychological Tests*
  • Psychometrics
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Resilience, Psychological*
  • Self Report
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Supplementary concepts

  • Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced Questionnaire

Grants and funding

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 (https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-2020_en) research and innovation program under Grant Agreement numbers 777084 (RK; DynaMORE project) and 101016127 (OT, RK; RESPOND project), from the German Research Foundation (AR; DFG CRC 1193, subproject Z03; https://www.dfg.de/en/), from the Stiftung Rheinland-Pfalz für Innovation (RK; MARP program, No 961-386261/1080; https://mwg.rlp.de/de/startseite/), and from the Ministry of Science of the state of Rhineland-Palatinate (RK; Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Weiterbildung und Kultur, Rheinland-Pfalz,DRZ program; https://mwg.rlp.de/de/startseite/). The Gutenberg Brain Study (OT) has received funding from Focus Program Translational Neuroscience (FTN) from the Ministry of Science of the state of Rhineland-Palatinate and the University Medical Center Mainz (Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Weiterbildung und Kultur, Rheinland-Pfalz and Universitätsmedizin Mainz https://www.blogs.uni-mainz.de/ftn-eng/).