Evaluation of CLINITEST® Rapid Covid-19 + Influenza antigen test in a cohort of symptomatic patients in an emergency department

Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 May;43(5):853-861. doi: 10.1007/s10096-024-04788-w. Epub 2024 Feb 29.

Abstract

Objectives: Rapid management of patients with respiratory tract infections in hospital emergency departments is one of the main objectives since the concurrent circulation of respiratory viruses following the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The use of new combined point-of-care antigen tests for detecting influenza A/B and SARS-CoV-2 represents an advantage in response time over the molecular tests. The objective was to evaluate the suitability of the CLINITEST® Rapid Covid-19 + Influenza Antigen test (Siemens Healthineers, Germany) (RCIA test) by measuring the sensitivity, specificity, Cohen's kappa, and cut-off values.

Methods: Nasopharyngeal samples were collected from a randomised group of symptomatic patients of all ages at emergency department during January-February 2023. In parallel, these patients were screened for influenza A/B, and SARS-CoV-2 using RT-PCR. The Ct (cycle threshold) values were collected for positive [RT-PCR (+) /RCIA test (+)] and false negative [(RT-PCR (+) /RCIA test (-)] samples. A subanalysis was performed in the paediatric population (< 16 years-old).

Results: We included 545 patients (55.8% females) with a median age of 7 years-old (IQR: 1-66.5). The RCIA test showed a sensitivity of 59.7% [95%CI: 46.9-67.33] for influenza A, 65.6% [95%CI: 49.5-80.3] for influenza B, and 76.9% [95%CI: 45.8-84.8] for SARS-CoV-2. The specificity was between 90.7%-99.7% with a moderate/high level of agreement with RT-PCR (kappa score: 0.6-0.8) for the three respiratory viruses included in the RCIA test.

Conclusions: The sensitivity of the RCIA test is insufficient for screening of patients, including patients with low Ct values (Ct > 20). Despite its good specificity and Cohen's kappa value, its use as a screening test is not comparable to RT-PCR systems in the ED environment with a high number of false negative results.

Keywords: Antigen test; Clinitest; Emergency department; Influenza A/B; Point-of-care; RT-PCR; Respiratory infection; SARS-CoV-2; Viruses.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antigens, Viral* / analysis
  • COVID-19 Serological Testing / methods
  • COVID-19* / diagnosis
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Cohort Studies
  • Emergency Service, Hospital*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Influenza A virus / immunology
  • Influenza A virus / isolation & purification
  • Influenza B virus / immunology
  • Influenza B virus / isolation & purification
  • Influenza, Human* / diagnosis
  • Influenza, Human* / virology
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nasopharynx / virology
  • Point-of-Care Testing
  • SARS-CoV-2* / genetics
  • SARS-CoV-2* / immunology
  • SARS-CoV-2* / isolation & purification
  • Sensitivity and Specificity*
  • Young Adult