How can trial designs better serve the needs of children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis?

Lancet Rheumatol. 2024 Sep;6(9):e648-e652. doi: 10.1016/S2665-9913(24)00026-2. Epub 2024 Mar 26.

Abstract

In juvenile idiopathic arthritis we have seen remarkable progress in the number of available licensed biological and small molecule treatments in the past two decades, leading to improved outcomes for patients. Designing clinical trials for these therapeutics is fraught with ethical, legislative, and practical challenges. However, many aspects of current clinical trial design in juvenile idiopathic arthritis do not meet the needs of patients and clinicians. Commonly used withdrawal trial designs raise substantial ethical concerns for patients and families who believe that they do not enable evidence-based and patient-centred decisions around medication choices. In this Viewpoint, we present the personal views of a patient and parent network that is of the opinion that current trial design in juvenile idiopathic arthritis is failing children and young people with juvenile idiopathic arthritis and set out the need for change informed by lived experience.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Antirheumatic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Arthritis, Juvenile* / drug therapy
  • Arthritis, Juvenile* / therapy
  • Child
  • Clinical Trials as Topic* / ethics
  • Clinical Trials as Topic* / methods
  • Humans
  • Research Design*

Substances

  • Antirheumatic Agents