Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of acute coronary syndrome in young women. There is no consensus on optimal treatment, though a conservative approach including antiplatelet agents is commonly used. We hypothesized that most cases of SCAD would not demonstrate true lumen thrombus in the dissected artery, suggesting that anti-platelet agents might not have a role in the treatment of SCAD.
Methods: We conducted a systematic review of the published literature through March 2022 to identify pathology images from individuals who died of SCAD. The images were independently reviewed by a pathologist to assess for the presence of thrombus and inflammatory cells.
Results: We identified 40 cases from 34 publications with available pathology images and found only one case of true lumen thrombus. Additionally, we found that 53% of cases involved eosinophilic inflammation.
Conclusion: The role of antiplatelet agents in the treatment of SCAD should be re-evaluated. Further studies are needed to better understand the significance and treatment implications of eosinophilic inflammation.
Keywords: Anti-platelet; SCAD; Spontaneous coronary artery dissection.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.