[Prognostic performance of pulmonary effective arterial elastance in patients with heart failure]

Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2024 Apr 24;52(4):397-404. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20231120-00449.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To explore the predictive value of pulmonary effective arterial elastance (Ea) in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, which retrospectively included 284 patients with HF who underwent right heart catheterization at Heart Failure Center in Fuwai Hospital between September 2013 and February 2022. Data regarding baseline clinical characteristics, hemodynamic profiles, and prognosis were collected. Ea was calculated as mean pulmonary arterial pressure/stroke volume. Patients were divided into Ea<0.555 group and Ea≥0.555 group according to the median value of Ea (0.555 mmHg/ml, 1 mmHg=0.133 kPa). The primary outcome was the primary clinical event, set as the first occurrence of a series of composite events, including all-cause death, heart transplantation, left ventricular assist device implantation, and HF rehospitalization. Event-free survival was defined as the absence of primary clinical events. Spearman correlation analysis was used to calculate the correlation coefficient between Ea and parameters reflective of right heart function. The Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to compare the different groups for the estimation of outcomes with the log-rank test. We used Cox proportional-hazards regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for primary clinical event. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the age, gender, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, left ventricular ejection fraction, presence of pulmonary hypertension, and serum N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) values. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) of Ea for predicting event-free survival in patients with HF. Results: The median age was 51 years, and 206 (72.5%) patients were male. Ea and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were significantly correlated (r=0.698, P<0.001). The correlation between Ea and pulmonary arterial elastance (PAC) were even more significant (r=-0.888, P<0.001). Compared with Ea<0.555 group, Ea≥0.555 group presented with higher serum NT-proBNP values (4 443 (1 792, 8 554) ng/L vs. 1 721 (480, 4 528)ng/L,P<0.001), higher PVR (3.4 (2.5, 4.7) Wood vs. 1.4 (0.9, 2.2) Wood, P<0.001), lower cardiac output (3.0 (2.3, 3.9) L/min vs. 4.3 (3.8, 4.9) L/min, P<0.001), and lower PAC (1.6 (1.3, 2.0) ml/mmHg vs. 4.0 (3.0, 6.0) ml/mmHg, P<0.001). The median follow-up time was 392 (166, 811) days. The Kaplan-Meier survival curve demonstrated a lower event-free survival rate in the Ea≥0.555 group compared to the Ea<0.555 group (Plog-rank<0.001). After multivariate adjustment, Ea (HR=1.734, P<0.001) remained significantly associated with the primary outcome. Subgroup analysis indicated that Ea was associated with the primary outcome across all subgroups. The AUC was 0.724 (P<0.001) for Ea to predict event-free survival calculated from ROC analysis. Conclusions: Ea is closely related to parameters reflective of right ventricular afterload. Increased Ea is an independent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with HF.

目的: 评估肺有效动脉弹性(Ea)在心力衰竭(心衰)患者长期预后评估中的潜在价值。 方法: 该研究为回顾性队列研究,纳入2013年9月至2022年2月在阜外医院心衰中心行漂浮导管检查的284例心衰患者。收集患者的基线临床资料、血流动力学数据及预后信息。Ea的计算公式为平均肺动脉压/每搏输出量。根据Ea的中位数值(0.555 mmHg/ml,1 mmHg=0.133 kPa)将患者分为Ea<0.555组和Ea≥0.555组。主要终点为主要临床事件,设定为包括全因死亡、心脏移植、左心室辅助装置植入和因心衰再住院的复合事件。无事件生存定义为未发生主要临床事件。采用Spearman相关性分析Ea与右心功能指标的相关性。采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析,log-rank法比较两组间无事件生存率差异。采用Cox比例风险回归模型分析Ea与主要临床事件的关联,并根据研究对象的年龄、性别、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级、左心室射血分数、是否合并肺动脉高压以及N末端B型利钠肽原(NT-proBNP)水平进行亚组分析。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线计算Ea预测心衰患者无事件生存的曲线下面积(AUC)。 结果: 所有患者的中位年龄为51岁,男性206例(72.5%)。Ea与肺动脉顺应性(r=-0.888,P<0.001)和肺血管阻力(r=0.698,P<0.001)显著相关。与Ea<0.555组相比,Ea≥0.555组患者的NT-proBNP水平[4 443(1 792,8 554)ng/L比1 721(480,4 528)ng/L,P<0.001]、肺血管阻力[3.4(2.5,4.7)Wood比1.4(0.9,2.2)Wood,P<0.001]更高,心输出量[3.0(2.3,3.9)L/min比4.3(3.8,4.9)L/min,P<0.001]、肺动脉顺应性[1.6(1.3,2.0)ml/mmHg比4.0(3.0,6.0)ml/mmHg,P<0.001]更低。中位随访时间392(166,811)d,Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,Ea≥0.555组的无事件生存率低于Ea<0.555组(Plog-rank<0.001)。多因素Cox回归分析结果显示,Ea是主要终点的独立预测因子(HR=1.734,95%CI 1.314~2.289,P<0.001)。亚组分析表明,Ea对各类心衰人群均存在预测价值(P均<0.05)。Ea预测心衰患者无事件生存的AUC为0.724(P<0.001)。 结论: Ea与右心室后负荷指标密切相关,Ea升高是心衰患者不良预后的独立预测因子。.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Cardiac Catheterization / methods
  • Female
  • Heart Failure* / mortality
  • Heart Failure* / physiopathology
  • Hemodynamics
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Natriuretic Peptide, Brain / blood
  • Prognosis
  • Pulmonary Artery / physiopathology
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stroke Volume

Substances

  • Natriuretic Peptide, Brain