[Efficacy analysis of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy combined with targeted drugs after progression on cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor treatment in hormone receptor positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-low metastatic breast cancer]

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2024 May 7;104(17):1507-1513. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20240207-00296.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy and endocrine therapy combined with targeted drugs after progression on cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor treatment in hormone receptor (HR) positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low metastatic breast cancer. Methods: Patients with metastatic breast cancer diagnosed with HR positive/HER2 low expression at the Fifth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital from October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2023 were retrospectively included. All patients received sequential chemotherapy or sequential endocrine therapy combined with targeted drugs after progression on CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment.The median follow-up was 9 months, and the follow-up ended on October 31, 2023. The patients were divided into chemotherapy group (receiving sequential chemotherapy) and endocrine therapy group (receiving sequential endocrine therapy combined with targeted drugs), according to the treatment plan. Information on demographic data, clinical and pathological diagnosis, treatment regimen, and efficacy evaluation was collected. The basic conditions of patients who may affect the curative effect of different treatment schemes were preset as stratified subgroups, including age, progesterone receptor (PR) status, HER2 status, disease-free survival, number of previous endocrine therapy and chemotherapy, and visceral metastasis. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate(CBR) and PFS based on stratification factors. The survival curve was plotted by Kaplan-Meier method, the comparison of PFS between groups was performed by log-rank test, and the comparison of ORR and CBR between groups were performed by χ2 test. Results: A total of 188 patients were included, including 126 patients in the chemotherapy group [all females, aged 29-74 (51±10) years] and 62 patients in the endocrine therapy group [1 male and 61 female, aged 29-77 (51±12) years]. ORR of chemotherapy group was 23.0% (29/126), higher than that of endocrine treatment group [3.2% (2/62)] (P<0.001); The CBR of chemotherapy group and endocrine therapy group were 46.8% (59/126) and 33.9% (21/62), respectively, with no statistical significance (P=0.091). The median PFS of chemotherapy group and endocrine therapy group were 5.0 (95%CI: 4.3-5.7) and 4.0 (95%CI: 1.6-6.4) months, respectively, with no statistical significance (P=0.484). In the preset stratified subgroups, the median PFS of chemotherapy [6.0 (95%CI: 5.4-6.6) months] was longer than that of endocrine combined with targeted therapy [2.0 (95%CI: 1.8-2.2) months] (P<0.001) in PR negative patients; In patients who had progressed on over 2 previous endocrine treatments, the median PFS of chemotherapy [5.0 (95%CI: 3.8-6.2) months] was longer than that of endocrine combined with targeted therapy [2.0 (95%CI: 0.6-3.4) months] (P=0.045). Conclusions: After progression on treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors for HR-positive/HER2-low expression metastatic breast cancer, both chemotherapy and endocrine therpy combined with targeted drugs are viable treatment options. However, for patients with PR negative or ≥2 lines of endocrine therapy previously, priority should be accorded to chemotherapy.

目的: 评价细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(CDK4/6)抑制剂治疗失败后,激素受体(HR)阳性/人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)低表达晚期乳腺癌患者接受化疗和内分泌联合靶向治疗的疗效。 方法: 回顾性纳入2018年10月1日至2023年9月30日于解放军总医院第五医学中心诊断为HR阳性/HER2低表达的晚期乳腺癌患者,均经CDK4/6抑制剂治疗失败后,接受序贯化疗或序贯内分泌联合靶向治疗。随访截止日期为2023年10月31日,中位随访时间9个月。根据治疗方案,分为化疗组(接受序贯化疗)和内分泌治疗组(接受序贯内分泌联合靶向治疗)。收集患者人口学资料、临床和病理诊断、治疗方案、疗效评价等信息。根据可能影响不同治疗方案疗效的患者基本情况设置亚组,包括年龄、孕激素受体(PR)状态、HER2表达水平、无病生存期、既往化疗和内分泌治疗线数、有无内脏转移。主要研究终点为无进展生存期(PFS),次要终点包括客观缓解率(ORR)、临床获益率(CBR)和基于分层因素的PFS。采用Kaplan-Meier法绘制生存曲线,PFS的组间比较采用log-rank检验,ORR和CBR的组间比较采用χ2检验。 结果: 共纳入患者188例,化疗组126例[均为女性,年龄29~74(51±10)岁],内分泌治疗组62例[男1例,女61例,年龄29~77(51±12)岁]。化疗组的ORR为23.0%(29/126),高于内分泌治疗组[3.2%(2/62)](P<0.001);化疗组和内分泌治疗组的CBR分别为46.8%(59/126)和33.9%(21/62),差异无统计学意义(P=0.091)。化疗组和内分泌治疗组的中位PFS分别为5.0(95%CI:4.3~5.7)和4.0(95%CI:1.6~6.4)个月,差异无统计学意义(P=0.484)。亚组分析提示,PR阴性的患者中,接受化疗的患者中位PFS[6.0(95%CI:5.4~6.6)个月]优于内分泌联合靶向治疗的患者[2.0(95%CI:1.8~2.2)个月](P<0.001);既往经过2线及以上内分泌治疗失败的患者中,接受化疗的患者中位PFS[5.0(95%CI:3.8~6.2)个月]优于内分泌联合靶向治疗的患者[2.0(95%CI:0.6~3.4)个月](P=0.045)。 结论: HR阳性/HER2低表达晚期乳腺癌经CDK4/6抑制剂治疗失败后,可选择化疗和内分泌联合靶向治疗。对于PR阴性、2线及以上内分泌治疗失败后或需要快速获得疾病缓解的患者,应优先选择化疗。.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use
  • Breast Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Breast Neoplasms* / metabolism
  • Breast Neoplasms* / pathology
  • Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4* / antagonists & inhibitors
  • Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4* / metabolism
  • Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6* / metabolism
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Metastasis
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Receptor, ErbB-2* / metabolism
  • Receptors, Progesterone / metabolism

Substances

  • CDK4 protein, human
  • CDK6 protein, human
  • Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4
  • Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6
  • ERBB2 protein, human
  • Protein Kinase Inhibitors
  • Receptor, ErbB-2
  • Receptors, Progesterone