The chemical and optical stability evaluation of injectable restorative materials under wet challenge

J Dent. 2024 Jul:146:105031. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105031. Epub 2024 May 6.

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate and compare the chemical and optical stability of four restorative composite materials: two injectable resins, one flowable resin and one compomer.

Methods: Two injectable nano-filled composite resins: G-aenial Universal (GU) and Beautifil Injectable XSL (BI), a flowable composite resin: Filtek Supreme Flowable (FS) and a compomer: Dyract Flow (DF), in A2 shade were tested and compared. Water sorption and solubility were conducted according to ISO4049:2019 standard; ICP-OES and F-ion selective electrode were used to test the elemental release; Degree of conversion (DC) was obtained by using FTIR; water contact angle was obtained by static sessile drop method, and a spectrophotometer was used for optical properties (ΔE, ΔL and TP). SPSS 28.0 was used for statistical analysis and the significant level was pre-set as α = 0.05.

Results: GU performed the best in water sorption and solubility, FS had the lowest elemental release, the best colour stability, and the highest DCIM and DC24-h. DF, the compomer had the lowest, and GU and BI, the injectable composites had the largest water contact angle, respectively. Correlations were found between water sorption and water solubility.

Conclusions: The four composite restorative materials showed different chemical and optical behaviours. Overall, composite resins performed better than compomer, while additional laboratory and in vivo tests are necessary to obtain a more comprehensive comparison between injectable and flowable composite resins. Wsp and Wsl are influenced by many common factors, and the values are highly positively related.

Clinical significance: A comprehensive understanding of materials is crucial before selecting materials for clinical practice. Composite resins rather than compomers are recommended because of their exceptional properties, which make them eligible for a wide range of clinical applications and an elongated lifespan.

Keywords: Chemical stability; Colour stability; Composite material; Injectable.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate
  • Color*
  • Compomers* / chemistry
  • Composite Resins* / chemistry
  • Dental Materials* / chemistry
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent / methods
  • Humans
  • Injections
  • Materials Testing*
  • Methacrylates / chemistry
  • Nanocomposites / chemistry
  • Optical Phenomena
  • Polyurethanes / chemistry
  • Solubility*
  • Spectrophotometry
  • Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared
  • Surface Properties
  • Water* / chemistry

Substances

  • Composite Resins
  • Dental Materials
  • Filtek Supreme
  • Water
  • Compomers
  • Beautifil composite resin
  • Dyract
  • Methacrylates
  • flowable hybrid composite
  • Polyurethanes
  • Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate