Cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin as add-on to standard of care for chronic kidney disease management in the United Kingdom

J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):777-785. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2357041. Epub 2024 Jun 5.

Abstract

Objective: The sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor empagliflozin was approved for treatment of adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on the basis of its demonstrated ability to slow CKD progression and reduce the risk of cardiovascular death. This analysis was performed to assess the cost-effectiveness of empagliflozin plus standard of care (SoC) vs SoC alone in the treatment of CKD in the UK.

Methods: A comprehensive, patient-level CKD progression model that simulates the evolution of risk factors for disease progression based on CKD-specific equations and clinical data was used to project a broad range of CKD-related complications. Patient baseline characteristics, distribution across Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) health states, and changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), urine albumin-creatinine ratio (uACR), and other parameters while on treatment were derived from the EMPA-KIDNEY trial. UK cost and utilities/disutilities were sourced from the literature. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted. Annual discounting of 3.5% was applied on costs and outcomes.

Results: Over a 50-year horizon, SoC resulted in per-patient costs, life years, and QALYs of £95,930, 8.55, and 6.28, respectively. Empagliflozin plus SoC resulted in an incremental gain in life years (+1.04) and QALYs (+0.84), while decreasing per-patient costs by £6,019. Empagliflozin was more effective and less costly (dominant) with a net monetary benefit of £22,849 at the willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000. Although treatment cost was higher for empagliflozin, this was more than offset by savings in kidney replacement therapy. Empagliflozin remained highly cost-effective in patients with and without diabetes, and across scenario and sensitivity analyses.

Limitations: This analysis is limited by reliance on short-term clinical trial data and by uncertainties in modelling CKD progression.

Conclusions: Empagliflozin as an add-on to SoC for treatment of adults with CKD represents cost-effective use of UK National Health Service (NHS) resources.

Keywords: Health economics; I; I1; I15; I19; chronic kidney disease; cost-effectiveness; empagliflozin; microsimulation.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Benzhydryl Compounds* / economics
  • Benzhydryl Compounds* / therapeutic use
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis*
  • Disease Progression
  • Female
  • Glomerular Filtration Rate
  • Glucosides* / economics
  • Glucosides* / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Models, Econometric
  • Quality-Adjusted Life Years*
  • Renal Insufficiency, Chronic* / drug therapy
  • Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors* / economics
  • Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors* / therapeutic use
  • United Kingdom

Substances

  • empagliflozin
  • Benzhydryl Compounds
  • Glucosides
  • Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors