Randomised clinical trial: Design of the SYNERGY-NASH phase 2b trial to evaluate tirzepatide as a treatment for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis and modification of screening strategy to reduce screen failures

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jul;60(1):17-32. doi: 10.1111/apt.18042. Epub 2024 May 20.

Abstract

Background: The use of histological inclusion criteria for clinical trials of at-risk metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH) is often associated with high screen failure rates.

Aims: To describe the design of a trial investigating tirzepatide treatment of MASH and to examine the effect of new inclusion criteria incorporating the use of the FibroScan-AST (FAST) score on the proportion of patients meeting histological criteria.

Methods: SYNERGY-NASH is a Phase 2b, multicentre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial in patients with biopsy-confirmed MASH, F2-F3 fibrosis and NAFLD Activity Score ≥4. New inclusion criteria (FAST score >0.35 and an increase in AST inclusion criterion from >20 to >23 U/L) were adopted during the trial, allowing us to examine its impact on the qualification rate.

Results: 1583 participants were screened, 651 participants proceeded to liver biopsy and 190 participants were randomised with an overall screen fail rate of 87%. Following the protocol amendment, the overall qualification rate for per-protocol biopsies was minimally changed from 27.5% to 28.9% with considerable variation among different investigator medical speciality types: endocrinology: from 37.5% to 39.3%; gastroenterology/hepatology: from 26.0% to 23.3%; other specialities: from 21.3% to 29.7%. At 29 sites that performed per-protocol biopsies before and after the amendment, qualification rates changed as follows: all: 26.1% to 29.1%; endocrinology: from 35.0% to 40.9%; gastroenterology/hepatology: 25.6% to 20.0%; other specialities: from 16.1% to 27.8%.

Conclusions: For at-risk MASH trials based on liver histology, the implementation of inclusion criteria with the proposed FAST score and AST cut-offs in this trial was most effective at non-specialist sites.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase II
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Biopsy / methods
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Liver / drug effects
  • Liver / metabolism
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease* / drug therapy
  • Patient Selection

Grants and funding