Clinical Value of Single-Projection Angiography-Derived FFR in Noninfarct-Related Artery

Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 May;17(5):e013844. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.123.013844. Epub 2024 May 21.

Abstract

Background: The Murray law-based quantitative flow ratio (μFR) is an emerging technique that requires only 1 projection of coronary angiography with similar accuracy to quantitative flow ratio (QFR). However, it has not been validated for the evaluation of noninfarct-related artery (non-IRA) in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) settings. Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of μFR and the safety of deferring non-IRA lesions with μFR >0.80 in the setting of AMI.

Methods: μFR and QFR were analyzed for non-IRA lesions of patients with AMI enrolled in the FRAME-AMI trial (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography-Guided Strategy for Management of Non-Infarction Related Artery Stenosis in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction), consisting of fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention and angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention groups. The diagnostic accuracy of μFR was compared with QFR and FFR. Patients were classified by the non-IRA μFR value of 0.80 as a cutoff value. The primary outcome was a vessel-oriented composite outcome, a composite of cardiac death, non-IRA-related myocardial infarction, and non-IRA-related repeat revascularization.

Results: μFR and QFR analyses were feasible in 443 patients (552 lesions). μFR showed acceptable correlation with FFR (R=0.777; P<0.001), comparable C-index with QFR to predict FFR ≤0.80 (μFR versus QFR: 0.926 versus 0.961, P=0.070), and shorter total analysis time (mean, 32.7 versus 186.9 s; P<0.001). Non-IRA with μFR >0.80 and deferred percutaneous coronary intervention had a significantly lower risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome than non-IRA with performed percutaneous coronary intervention (3.4% versus 10.5%; hazard ratio, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.14-0.99]; P=0.048).

Conclusions: In patients with multivessel AMI, μFR of non-IRA showed acceptable diagnostic accuracy comparable to that of QFR to predict FFR ≤0.80. Deferred non-IRA with μFR >0.80 showed a lower risk of vessel-oriented composite outcome than revascularized non-IRA.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02715518.

Keywords: coronary angiography; fractional flow reserve, myocardial; myocardial infarction; percutaneous coronary intervention.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Cardiac Catheterization
  • Coronary Angiography*
  • Coronary Artery Disease* / diagnostic imaging
  • Coronary Artery Disease* / physiopathology
  • Coronary Artery Disease* / therapy
  • Coronary Stenosis / diagnosis
  • Coronary Stenosis / diagnostic imaging
  • Coronary Stenosis / physiopathology
  • Coronary Stenosis / therapy
  • Coronary Vessels* / diagnostic imaging
  • Coronary Vessels* / physiopathology
  • Female
  • Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Myocardial Infarction* / diagnostic imaging
  • Myocardial Infarction* / physiopathology
  • Myocardial Infarction* / therapy
  • Percutaneous Coronary Intervention* / adverse effects
  • Predictive Value of Tests*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Risk Factors
  • Treatment Outcome

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT02715518