European validation of the classification for the anticipated difficulty of liver transplantation

HPB (Oxford). 2024 Aug;26(8):1033-1039. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.05.004. Epub 2024 May 15.

Abstract

Background: Appropriate risk stratification for the difficulty of liver transplantation (LT) is essential to guide the selection and acceptance of grafts and avoid morbidity and mortality.

Methods: Based on 987 LTs collected from 5 centers, perioperative outcomes were analyzed across the 3 difficulty levels. Each LT was retrospectively scored from 0 to 10. Scores of 0-2, 3-5 and 6-10 were then translated into respective difficulty levels: low, moderate and high. Complications were reported according to the comprehensive complication index (CCI).

Results: The difficulty level of LT in 524 (53%), 323 (32%), and 140 (14%) patients was classified as low, moderate and high, respectively. The values of major intraoperative outcomes, such as cold ischemia time (p = 0.04) and operative time (p < 0.0001) increased gradually with statistically significant values among difficulty levels. There was a corresponding increase in CCI (p = 0.04), severe complication rates (p = 0.05) and length of ICU (p = 0.01) and hospital (p = 0.004) stays across the different difficulty levels.

Conclusion: The LT difficulty classification has been validated.

Publication types

  • Validation Study
  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cold Ischemia
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Length of Stay
  • Liver Transplantation* / adverse effects
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Operative Time
  • Patient Selection
  • Postoperative Complications* / classification
  • Postoperative Complications* / etiology
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome