Shoulder arthroplasty in the upper extremity weight-bearing patient: a systematic review of clinical outcomes and complications

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Jan;34(1):e1-e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.03.067. Epub 2024 May 27.

Abstract

Background: Patients who rely on their upper extremities for ambulation, or upper extremity ambulators (UEAs), place considerable stress on their shoulders through the use of assistive devices like walkers, crutches, canes, and wheelchairs. It has been postulated that UEAs may be at increased risk for complications following shoulder arthroplasty. This study aimed to systematically review the literature related to (1) patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs), (2) functional outcomes, and (3) complications in UEAs who undergo shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify studies reporting clinical outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty in UEAs. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, patient-reported outcomes measures, radiographic outcomes, and postoperative range of motion were collected and compared to control patients (ie bipedal ambulators) from the constituent studies.

Results: A total of eight studies evaluating 248 UEA cases and 206 control cases were included for review. Ambulatory assistive devices utilized by UEAs included walkers (39%), wheelchairs (38%), canes (22%), and a crutch (<1%). Among UEA cases, 197 (79%) reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), 37 (15%) anatomic TSA, and 14 (6%) hemiarthroplasty were performed. Overall, patients exhibited significant improvements in mean American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, Constant-Murley scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, and Visual Analog Scale scores postoperatively. Among 3 studies that included comparison with control groups of bipedal ambulators, no significant differences in outcomes were identified. The overall clinical complication rate was 17% for UEAs compared to 9.1% for controls. The rate of revision surgery was 7.7% for UEAs and 4.9% for bipedal ambulators.

Conclusions: UEAs experience satisfactory pain relief, functional improvements, and good subjective outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty. However, complication and revision rates are higher compared to those for bipedal ambulators, and the majority of UEAs undergo reverse shoulder arthroplasty compared to anatomic TSA.

Keywords: Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; assistive device; complications; outcomes; shoulder arthroplasty; total shoulder arthroplasty; upper extremity ambulator; weight-bearing.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Shoulder* / methods
  • Humans
  • Patient Reported Outcome Measures
  • Postoperative Complications*
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Shoulder Joint / physiopathology
  • Shoulder Joint / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Upper Extremity / surgery
  • Weight-Bearing*