Background: Inhibiting ENaC in the airways of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) is hypothesized to enhance mucociliary clearance (MCC) and provide clinical benefit. Historically, inhaled ENaC blockers have failed to show benefit in pwCF challenging this hypothesis. It is however unknown whether the clinical doses were sufficient to provide the required long duration of action in the lungs and questions whether a novel candidate could offer advantages where others have failed?
Methods: Dose-responses with the failed ENaC blockers (VX-371, BI 1265162, AZD5634, QBW276) together with ETD001 (a novel long acting inhaled ENaC blocker) were established in a sheep model of MCC and were used to predict clinically relevant doses that would provide a long-lasting enhancement of MCC in pwCF. In each case, dose predictions were compared with the selected clinical dose.
Results: Each of the failed candidates enhanced MCC in the sheep model. Translating these dose-response data to human equivalent doses, predicted that substantially larger doses of each candidate, than were evaluated in clinical studies, would likely have been required to achieve a prolonged enhancement of MCC in pwCF. In contrast, ETD001 displayed a long duration of action (≥16 h) at a dose level that was well tolerated in Phase 1 clinical studies.
Conclusions: These data support that the ENaC blocker hypothesis is yet to be appropriately tested in pwCF. ETD001 has a profile that enables dosing at a level sufficient to provide a long duration of action in a Phase 2 clinical study in pwCF scheduled for 2024.
Keywords: AZD5634; BI 1265162; Cystic fibrosis; Epithelial sodium channel; Mucociliary clearance; QBW276; VX-371.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.