Statistical considerations for cardiovascular clinical trials straddling the continuum of pandemic phases

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2024 Dec:69:90-97. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.06.008. Epub 2024 Jun 8.

Abstract

In 2020, the NIH and FDA issued guidance documents that laid the foundation for human subject research during an unprecedented pandemic. To bridge these general considerations to actual applications in cardiovascular interventional device trials, the PAndemic Impact on INTErventional device ReSearch (PAIINTERS) Working Group was formed in early 2021 under the Predictable And Sustainable Implementation Of National CardioVascular Registries (PASSION CV Registries). The PAIINTER's Part I report, published by Rymer et al. [5], provided a comprehensive overview of the operational impact on interventional studies during the first year of the Pandemic. PAIINTERS Part II focused on potential statistical issues related to bias, variability, missing data, and study power when interventional studies may start and end in different pandemic phases. Importantly, the paper also offers practical mitigation strategies to adjust or minimize the impact for both SATs and RCTs, providing a valuable resource for researchers and professionals involved in cardiovascular clinical trials.

Keywords: Bias; COVID-19; Global Pandemic Phases; Missing data; Mitigations for increased heterogeneity; Statistical power; Variability.

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19* / epidemiology
  • COVID-19* / prevention & control
  • Cardiovascular Diseases* / diagnosis
  • Cardiovascular Diseases* / therapy
  • Clinical Trials as Topic* / standards
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical
  • Humans
  • Pandemics / prevention & control
  • Registries
  • Research Design / standards
  • Review Literature as Topic
  • United States