Outcomes of emergency surgical intervention for complications in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

Anand Kumar Mishra; Vidur Bansal; Rohit Manoj Kumar; Nitish Kumar; Nishit Patel; Apeksha Mittal

doi:10.1007/s12055-024-01722-9

Outcomes of emergency surgical intervention for complications in the cardiac catheterization laboratory

Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Jul;40(4):444-450. doi: 10.1007/s12055-024-01722-9. Epub 2024 Mar 19.

Authors

Anand Kumar Mishra¹, Vidur Bansal¹, Rohit Manoj Kumar², Nitish Kumar¹, Nishit Patel¹, Apeksha Mittal¹

Affiliations

¹ Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
² Department of Cardiology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

PMID: 38919180
PMCID: PMC11194233 (available on 2025-07-01)
DOI: 10.1007/s12055-024-01722-9

Abstract

Background: In today's era, cardiac catheterization procedures are becoming increasingly safe, but they are still fraught with complications. We aimed to study the outcomes of patients who underwent emergency surgical intervention for complications in the cardiac catheterization laboratory.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who required emergency surgical management following a complication in the cardiac catheterization laboratory in our institute from July 2017 to July 2022 was done.

Result: A total of 57 patients out of a total of 52,326 patients (0.1%) were included. The average age of presentation was 10.4 years. Congenital heart disease (CHD) constituted the majority of the cases (28/57-49.1%), coronary artery disease (CAD) constituted 19.3% (11/57), and rheumatic heart disease (RHD) constituted 8.8% (5/57) of the cases. Apart from this, 22.80% patients (13/57) were grouped together in the miscellaneous group. In total, 76.9% (10/13) of these patients had pericardial effusion and they developed a right ventricular (RV) rent following an attempted pigtail drainage. Also, one patient each had a RV rent following an attempted permanent pacemaker implantation for heart block and an endocardial biopsy respectively. One patient had a left bronchial rupture following thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for descending thoracic aorta (DTA) aneurysm. Thirty-day mortality was 7% (4/57), and the mean time of shifting the patients from the catheterization laboratory to the operating room was 8.3 h.

Conclusion: Cardiac catheterization procedures have become increasingly safe, but complications can still occur, for which the cardiac surgeon should be briefed in a Heart Team meeting before taking up such cases. Even though these complications form a small percentage, the cardiologist should exercise some caution in attempting cases which could have a relatively easier surgical correction.

Keywords: Catheterization; Complications; Emergency; Rupture; Surgery.

© Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.