Foramen ovale electrode investigation in the era of SEEG: Results and a reappraisal

Introduction: Patients with medication-resistant disabling epilepsy should be considered for potential epilepsy surgery. If noninvasive techniques are unable to identify the location of the seizure onset zone (SOZ), it becomes necessary to consider intracranial investigations. Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is currently the preferred method for such monitoring, however foramen ovale (FO) electrodes offer a less invasive alternative that may be suitable in certain situations. Previous studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of FO electrodes in suspected mesial temporal epilepsy, nevertheless, increased experience with FO electrode use could further enhance their safety and efficacy. Therefore, we conducted an analysis of recent FO electrode investigations to assess their utility in surgical decision making, post resection outcomes, and complication rates.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 61 patients who underwent FO placement at Mass General Brigham between 2009 and 2020. Patient and seizure characteristics, preoperative investigation data, and seizures outcomes were collected. In addition, identified predictors of FO utility using logistic regression.

Results: A total of 61 patients were identified. FO evaluation localized the SOZ in 56 % of patients. Complications were encountered in 1.6 % of patients. Subsequent surgical resection was pursued by 49 % of patients, with 56 % becoming seizure free, and 67 % having favorable seizure outcomes at last follow-up. Multivariate analysis identified younger patients with a higher number of preoperative ASMs as more likely to undergo subsequent treatment, however, these features were not predictive features of SOZ localization, seizure freedom, or favorable seizure outcomes. In patients with bitemporal or cross-over onsets on scalp EEG, FO was able to identify the SOZ in 79 %, whereas in patients with discordant or unclear onset, the rates were 71 % and 45 %, respectively.

Conclusion: In a contemporary cohort, FO electrode placement had a low complication rate and a high utility primarily in cases of unclear laterality of mesial temporal onsets or discordance between scalp EEG and other pre-FO investigation data in cases of suspected mesial temporal onsets.