Background: The effect of metabolic syndrome (MetS) on the risk of revision after hip and knee arthroplasty is debated. The aim of our study was to investigate the risk of short-term (minimum 2.7 years) revision due to periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) after hip and knee arthroplasty. Secondly, we aimed to investigate the risk of revision due to any cause and mortality.
Methods: During May 2017 to November 2019, a cohort of 2,901 patients undergoing a total of 3,024 hip and knee arthroplasties was established. In the cohort, 62.1% met the criteria for MetS. Data from national registries and a local database were used to determine the presence of MetS and revision surgeries, with a follow-up of at least two years and eight months. Cox regression was applied to the present hazard ratio (HR), associated 95% confidence intervals, and P values. Survival analyses were presented in a Kaplan-Meier plot.
Results: The risk of PJI (HR 1.6 (0.5 to 4.9), P = .380), any revision (HR 0.8 (0.4 to 1.3), P = .295), and death (HR 1.3 (0.8 to 2.1), P = .282) was not increased in patients suffering from MetS compared with patients who did not have MetS. There was no PJI in patients not having MetS and receiving a knee arthroplasty. The risk of death was increased in the MetS group receiving a knee arthroplasty (HR 2.7 (1.3 to 5.9), P = .010), but not different from the MetS group receiving a hip arthroplasty. There was no elevated risk of PJI when analyzing morbid obesity (body mass index over 40), men, or diabetes as the exposures.
Conclusions: Patients suffering from MetS do not have an increased risk of revision caused by PJI. In general, performing hip and knee arthroplasty in patients suffering from MetS is without increased risk of revision surgery.
Keywords: arthroplasty; hip, knee; metabolic syndrome; osteoarthritis; revision.
Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.