Introduction: We aimed to evaluate clinical interpretation cutpoints for two plasma phosphorylated tau (p-tau)217 assays (ALZpath and Lumipulse) as predictors of amyloid status for implementation in clinical practice.
Methods: Clinical performance of plasma p-tau217 against amyloid positron emission tomography status was evaluated in participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia (n = 427).
Results: Using a one-cutpoint approach (negative/positive), neither assay achieved ≥ 90% in both sensitivity and specificity. A two-cutpoint approach yielding 92% sensitivity and 96% specificity provided the desired balance of false positives and false negatives, while categorizing 20% and 39% of results as indeterminate for the Lumipulse and ALZpath assays, respectively.
Discussion: This study provides a systematic framework for selection of assay-specific cutpoints for clinical use of plasma p-tau217 for determination of amyloid status. Our findings suggest that a two-cutpoint approach may have advantages in optimizing diagnostic accuracy while minimizing potential harm from false positive results.
Highlights: Phosphorylated tau (p-tau)217 cutpoints for detection of amyloid pathology were established. A two-cutpoint approach exhibited the best performance for clinical laboratory use. p-tau217 assays differed in the percentage of results categorized as intermediate.
Keywords: Alzheimer's disease; Fujirebio Lumipulse; Simoa ALZpath; amyloid pathology; amyloid positron emission tomography; blood‐based biomarkers; cutpoints; immunoassays; plasma phosphorylated tau217.
© 2024 The Author(s). Alzheimer's & Dementia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Alzheimer's Association.