Background and purpose: Radiological features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were attributed to oligodendroglioma, although the diagnostic accuracy in a real-world clinical setting remains partially elusive. This study investigated the accuracy and robustness of tumor heterogeneity and tumor border delineation on T2-weighted MRI to distinguish oligodendroglioma from astrocytoma.
Materials and methods: Eight readers from three different specialties (radiology, neurology, neurosurgery) with varying levels of experience blindly rated 79 T2-weighted MR images of patients with either oligodendroglioma or astrocytoma. After the first reading session, all readers were re-invited for a second reading session within three weeks. Diagnostic accuracy, including area under the receiver operator characteristics curve (AUC), and intra-observer variability and inter-observer variability were used as outcome measures.
Results: Pooled sensitivity and specificity to distinguish oligodendroglioma from astrocytoma for the use of tumor heterogeneity were 59.9 % respectively 74.5 %, and 85.7 % respectively 40.1 % for tumor border. A second reading session did not result in a significant change in sensitivity or specificity for tumor heterogeneity (P = 0.752 and P = 0.733, respectively) or tumor border (P = 0.309 and P = 0.271, respectively). An AUC of 0.825 was achieved with regard to predicting oligodendroglial origin of gliomas. Intra-observer agreement ranged from moderate to very good for tumor heterogeneity (kappa-value 0.43-0.87) and tumor border (0.40-0.84). A moderate inter-oberserver agreement was achieved for tumor heterogeneity and tumor border (kappa-value of 0.50 and 0.45, respectively).
Conclusion: This study demonstrates that tumor heterogeneity and tumor borders on T2-weighted MRI could be used with moderate Finter-observer agreement to non-invasively distinguish oligodendroglioma from astrocytoma.
Keywords: Astrocytoma; Diagnosis; Magnetic resonance imaging; Oligodendroglioma.
Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.