Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation of Proximal Tears and Early Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation Result in Comparable Clinical Outcomes With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2-Year Follow-Up

Sebastien G Simard; Christina J Greenfield; Anthony N Khoury

doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.021

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With Suture Tape Augmentation of Proximal Tears and Early Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Suture Tape Augmentation Result in Comparable Clinical Outcomes With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction at 2-Year Follow-Up

Arthroscopy. 2024 Jul 26:S0749-8063(24)00518-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.021. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Sebastien G Simard¹, Christina J Greenfield², Anthony N Khoury³

Affiliations

¹ Clinique Chirurgicale de Laval, Laval, Québec, Canada.
² Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
³ Orthopedic Research Department, Arthrex, Naples, Florida, U.S.A.. Electronic address: [email protected].

PMID: 39069021
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2024.07.021

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the postoperative side-to-side laxity and short-term clinical outcomes of patients who received primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair with suture tape augmentation, acute anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with suture tape augmentation performed within 8 weeks of injury (ACLR_acute), or ACLR beyond 8 weeks of injury.

Methods: After institutional review board approval was obtained, 100 patients were enrolled in this prospective trial: 34 primary ACL repair with suture tape augmentation, 33 ACLRs performed within 8 weeks of injury (ACLR_acute), and 33 ACLRs. Patients were allocated to ACL repair if a proximal avulsion was present with good tissue quality (Sherman type 1), confirmed by intraoperative diagnostic arthroscopy. Preoperative side-to-side anteroposterior knee laxity was assessed with KT-1000 arthrometer, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including the visual analog scale, Marx activity scale, Veterans RAND 12-item health survey (VR-12 physical & mental), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score survey subscales, and range of motion were collected. These objective and subjective measures were repeated at regular intervals postoperatively through 2 years. Minimal clinically important difference calculations were performed assessing postoperative PRO changes at 2 years compared with preoperative.

Results: The average time from injury to surgery was 5.03 ± 1.2 weeks for the ACL repair group, 5.09 ± 0.74 weeks for the ACLR_acute, and 43.22 ± 33.5 weeks for the ACLR group. Postoperatively, the KT-1000 side-to-side laxity difference for 30 lbs was determined to be 0.1 ± 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.7 to 0.8) for ACL repair versus ACLR (P < .0001), -0.8 ± 0.35 (95% CI -1.5 to -0.1) for ACLR_acute versus ACLR (P < .0001), and 0.8 ± 0.40 (95% CI 0.0-1.6) for ACL repair versus ACLR_acute (P < .0001). The data reveal ACL repair and ACLR_acute are noninferior to ACLR at 2-year follow-up. The postoperative difference from baseline for all PROs demonstrated improvement for all PROs. Magnetic resonance imaging at 1 year revealed tissue healing for the 3 ACL injury treatment groups.

Conclusions: Patients who underwent ACL repair of proximal tears with suture tape augmentation or ACL reconstruction within 8 weeks from injury resulted in noninferior side-to-side knee laxity, comparable PROs, and similar range of motion at 2-year follow-up compared with ACLR.

Level of evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.