Refluxing versus Non-Refluxing Ureteric Implantation in Continent Cutaneous Urinary Diversion: A Propensity-Scored Comparison regarding Long-Term Renal, Metabolic, and Functional Outcomes of Patients with Ileocecal Pouch

Urol Int. 2024 Jul 31:1-7. doi: 10.1159/000540096. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Introduction: Studies comparing refluxing versus non-refluxing ureteric implantation in continent cutaneous urinary diversion (CCUD) are scarce and often characterized by heterogeneous study populations. This work therefore aimed at comparing both techniques regarding long-term outcomes in a propensity-scored approach.

Methods: We identified n = 19 patients, totaling n = 38 renal units (RU), who underwent CCUD surgery at our hospital out of a pool of 120 patients. Of these 38 RU, 27 RU were implanted via refluxing ureteric implantation utilizing various procedures due to special intraoperative circumstances (short ureters, damage due to radiation). In terms of preoperative renal function, a comorbidity index (Age-Adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index [ACCI]), and gender, we compared them to n = 38 patients with a total of 76 RU with non-refluxing ureteric implantation in all RU (1:2 matching). The mean follow-up was 56 (IQR: 23-112) months.

Results: Long-term renal function was comparable in CCUD patients receiving refluxing versus non-refluxing ureteric implantation (estimated glomerular filtration rate: 63.11 mL/min vs. 71.7 mL/min, p = 0.22) with an average decline of 17.4 mL/min and 13.69 mL/min during the follow-up period, respectively. Also, the rate of new-onset chronic kidney disease (CKD) (both 15%, p = 1), the need for alkalizing medication, or the number of pyelonephritis episodes did not significantly differ between the groups. In Cox regression analysis, ACCI was the single most predictive parameter for the development of new-onset CKD (HR: 1.71 [1.10-2.66], p = 0.0167). None of the RU in the refluxing group needed revisional surgery concerning the ureterointestinal anastomosis, whereas 7 RU of the non-refluxing group did.

Conclusions: Our study confirms that refluxing ureteric implantation in CCUDs is a valid and safe procedure regarding long-term renal, metabolic and functional outcomes. Our data also suggest that patients should be counseled according to their comorbidities regarding long-term renal function.

Keywords: Continent cutaneous urinary diversion; Ileocecal pouch; Ureteric implantation; Urinary diversion.