Impact of different range areas on behavior, welfare, and performance of Naked Neck chickens

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2024 Aug 3;56(7):227. doi: 10.1007/s11250-024-04079-8.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effect of different environmental enrichment tools on behavior, welfare, productive performance, and egg quality traits of Naked Neck chickens. A total of 1080 Naked Neck female chickens (30 weeks old) were used in the present study. A completely randomized experimental design, with 3 treatments having 4 replicates of 90 birds each, was applied. Treatments consisted of 3 different range areas A (121.9 m2), B (152.4 m2), and C (190.5 m2). Behavior (walking, feeding/foraging, sitting, aggressiveness wing flapping, perching, dust bathing, and range use), welfare (foot pad dermatitis, lameness, gait score, and feather pecking), productive performance (egg weight, egg production %, egg mass, and feed intake), egg quality traits (morphometry, egg weight, shell, albumen, and yolk characteristics) were evaluated. There was no influence (P > 0.05) of different range area on bird's behavior, and egg quality traits except walking and rang usage. The range area C promoted productive performance including egg weight, egg production %, egg mass and feed intake, but it did not influence welfare traits. It might be concluded that Naked Neck chicken when reared in free range with different range enrichments did not reveal any difference regarding behavioral parameters, egg morphometry, and egg quality traits. The range area within minimum length and effectively used environmental enrichments (perching and dust bathing area) should be used for backyard poultry to obtain ideal performance.

Keywords: Behavior, welfare; Egg quality; Free range; Naked Neck chickens.

MeSH terms

  • Animal Husbandry* / methods
  • Animal Welfare*
  • Animals
  • Behavior, Animal*
  • Chickens* / physiology
  • Eggs / analysis
  • Female
  • Housing, Animal*
  • Random Allocation