Comparison of polishing methods for two types of monolithic all-ceramic crowns after occlusal adjustments: Polishing paste versus glazed porcelain

Dent Mater J. 2024 Sep 28;43(5):667-671. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2024-058. Epub 2024 Aug 9.

Abstract

This study compared the effects of two surface preparation methods on two types of zirconia. Immediately prior to the placement of a monolithic zirconia crown, its morphology may be modified using a rotary cutting instrument for occlusal adjustments. The crown surface is scratched during the grinding process and, thus, requires polishing. Simplified zirconia crowns of 3Y and 5Y were fabricated and used as specimens. The surface roughness and gloss of the occlusal surfaces of specimens were measured and compared when a polishing compound was used after polishing points and when a silica-based coating was sintered. No significant differences were observed in surface roughness between 3Y and 5Y zirconia. The use of polishing compounds was effective because polishing points alone only resulted in a level of surface roughness that may cause wear on antagonist teeth. Although the silica-based coating improved surface properties, the polishing compound more effectively improved surface roughness.

Keywords: Monolithic zirconia crown; Polishing; Polishing compounds; Surface properties; Surface roughness.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Crowns*
  • Dental Polishing* / methods
  • Dental Porcelain* / chemistry
  • Dental Prosthesis Design
  • Materials Testing*
  • Occlusal Adjustment
  • Silicon Dioxide / chemistry
  • Surface Properties*
  • Zirconium* / chemistry

Substances

  • Zirconium
  • Dental Porcelain
  • zirconium oxide
  • Silicon Dioxide