Clinical Outcomes and Re-Tear Rates for Partial Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With or Without Biceps Augmentation for Large-to-Massive Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Orthopedics. 2024 Sep-Oct;47(5):e217-e224. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20240809-01. Epub 2024 May 29.

Abstract

Background: The recent addition of biceps tendon augmentation to partial arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) for the treatment of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears is proposed to improve clinical outcomes and reduce re-tears.

Materials and methods: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis (5 studies) was to compare outcomes between partial ARCR with (142 patients) and without (149 patients) biceps augmentation.

Results: Partial ARCR with and without biceps augmentation were comparable in pain, function, and range of motion. However, biceps augmentation vs no augmentation at all during ARCR may lower re-tear rates for irreparable large-to-massive rotator cuff tears (42.9% vs 72.5%, P=.007).

Conclusion: More research is needed to investigate this technique and guide surgical decision-making. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(5):e217-e224.].

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Arthroscopy* / methods
  • Humans
  • Rotator Cuff / surgery
  • Rotator Cuff Injuries* / surgery
  • Treatment Outcome