Open Versus Endoscopic Approach for Thoracic Disk Herniations: Equivalent Short-Term Outcomes With Significantly Different Costs

Campbell Liles; Hani Chanbour; Omar Zakieh; Keyan Peterson; Robert J Dambrino 4th; Iyan Younus; Soren Jonzzon; Richard A Berkman; Julian G Lugo-Pico; Amir M Abtahi; Byron F Stephens; Scott L Zuckerman; Raymond J Gardocki

doi:10.1227/ons.0000000000001325

Open Versus Endoscopic Approach for Thoracic Disk Herniations: Equivalent Short-Term Outcomes With Significantly Different Costs

Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). 2024 Aug 27. doi: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001325. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Campbell Liles^{1

2}, Hani Chanbour¹, Omar Zakieh³, Keyan Peterson¹, Robert J Dambrino 4th¹, Iyan Younus¹, Soren Jonzzon¹, Richard A Berkman¹, Julian G Lugo-Pico^{1

3}, Amir M Abtahi^{1

3}, Byron F Stephens^{1

3}, Scott L Zuckerman^{1

3}, Raymond J Gardocki^{1

3}

Affiliations

¹ Department of Neurological Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
² Vanderbilt Policy and Costs in Surgery (VPaCS) Research Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
³ Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

PMID: 39189741
DOI: 10.1227/ons.0000000000001325

Abstract

Background and objectives: Open thoracic diskectomy often requires significant bone resection and fusion, whereas an endoscopic thoracic diskectomy offers a less invasive alternative. Therefore, we sought to compare one-level open vs endoscopic thoracic diskectomy regarding (1) perioperative outcomes, (2) neurological recovery, and (3) total cost.

Methods: A single-center, retrospective, cohort study using prospectively collected data of patients undergoing one-level thoracic diskectomy was undertaken from 2018 to 2023. The primary exposure variable was open vs endoscopic. The primary outcome was perioperative outcomes and neurological recovery. Secondary outcomes were total cost of care. Multivariable regression analysis controlled for age, body mass index, sex, symptom onset, disk characteristics, operative time, and length of stay.

Results: Of 29 patients undergoing thoracic diskectomy, 17 were open and 12 were endoscopic. Preoperative demographics, symptoms, and radiographic findings were comparable between the cohorts. Perioperatively, open surgery had significantly higher mean length of stay (4.9 ± 1.5 vs 0.0 ± 0.0 days, P < .001), median (IQR) longer operative time (342.8 [68.4] vs 141.5 [36] minutes, P < .001), and more blood loss (350 [390] vs 6.5 [20] mL; P < .001). 16 (94%) open patients required fusion vs 0 endoscopic (P < .001). Postoperative opioid use (P = .119), readmission (P = .665), reoperation (P = .553), and rate of neurological improvement (P > .999) were similar between the 2 groups. Financially, open surgical median costs were 7x higher than endoscopic ($59 792 [$16 118] vs $8128 [$1848]; P < .001), driven by length of stay (β = $2261/night, P < .001), open surgery (β = $24 106, P < .001), and number of pedicle screws (β = $1829/screw, P = .002) on multivariable analysis. On sensitivity analysis, open surgery was never cost-efficient against endoscopic surgery and excess endoscopic revision rates of 86% above open revision rates were required for break-even costs between the surgical approaches.

Conclusion: Endoscopic thoracic diskectomy was associated with decreased length of stay, operative time, blood loss, and total cost compared with the open approach, with similar neurological outcomes. These findings may help patients and surgeons seek endoscopic approach as a less morbid and less costly alternative.