Ethics of residency candidates using application consulting services

Albert E Zhou; Elaine Flynn; Timothy Klufas; Shannon Hanggodo; Neelesh P Jain; Jane M Grant-Kels

doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2024.08.011

Ethics of residency candidates using application consulting services

Clin Dermatol. 2024 Sep 3:S0738-081X(24)00151-2. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2024.08.011. Online ahead of print.

Authors

Albert E Zhou¹, Elaine Flynn², Timothy Klufas³, Shannon Hanggodo⁴, Neelesh P Jain¹, Jane M Grant-Kels⁵

Affiliations

¹ Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
² University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA.
³ New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, New York, USA.
⁴ Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut, USA.
⁵ Department of Dermatology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA; Department of Dermatology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA. Electronic address: [email protected].

PMID: 39236848
DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2024.08.011

Abstract

Although the prevalence is still being determined, more medical students are using application consulting companies when applying to competitive residencies such as dermatology. We outline the structure of these companies, the scope of services provided, and the associated costs. We also discuss the ethical implications of using such firms in the residency application process and the impact of these practices on the candidate selection process. Finally, we offer possible solutions and measures that mitigate the impact of the use of consulting firms in residency applications.